<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Has &#8216;project go online&#8217; for Indian newspapers failed?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mahesh.com/2010/02/01/has-project-go-online-for-indian-newspapers-failed/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mahesh.com/2010/02/01/has-project-go-online-for-indian-newspapers-failed</link>
	<description>Internet in India</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 02:13:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikhil Narayanan</title>
		<link>http://www.mahesh.com/2010/02/01/has-project-go-online-for-indian-newspapers-failed/comment-page-1#comment-23599</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikhil Narayanan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 12:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahesh.com/?p=1267#comment-23599</guid>
		<description>Mahesh- Okay. :) 
May be too long a beta-time for a newspaper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mahesh- Okay. <img src='http://www.mahesh.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
May be too long a beta-time for a newspaper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bgmahesh</title>
		<link>http://www.mahesh.com/2010/02/01/has-project-go-online-for-indian-newspapers-failed/comment-page-1#comment-23588</link>
		<dc:creator>bgmahesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 08:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahesh.com/?p=1267#comment-23588</guid>
		<description>Nikhil - running beta is perfectly fine and legitimate. I have never said it is wrong. But running it in beta since August 15, 2009 is a long period</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nikhil &#8211; running beta is perfectly fine and legitimate. I have never said it is wrong. But running it in beta since August 15, 2009 is a long period</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikhil Narayanan</title>
		<link>http://www.mahesh.com/2010/02/01/has-project-go-online-for-indian-newspapers-failed/comment-page-1#comment-23582</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikhil Narayanan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 07:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mahesh.com/?p=1267#comment-23582</guid>
		<description>Mahesh,
I buy everything here except the line
&lt;i&gt;One needs to wonder why The Hindu has been in beta forever?&lt;/i&gt;
Afaik, The Hindu was the first Indian newspaper to go online. I am talking about the days when they were hosted on IndiaServer.com
The current beta stint started recently(Aug 15,2009).So, picking on that seems very trivial to me. It is not *forever*. Been just over 6 months.
Since you have said that online and offline spaces are different,we have to accept the fact that like any online offering, TH&#039;s new version also goes through a beta (testing) stage. 
-Nikhil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mahesh,<br />
I buy everything here except the line<br />
<i>One needs to wonder why The Hindu has been in beta forever?</i><br />
Afaik, The Hindu was the first Indian newspaper to go online. I am talking about the days when they were hosted on IndiaServer.com<br />
The current beta stint started recently(Aug 15,2009).So, picking on that seems very trivial to me. It is not *forever*. Been just over 6 months.<br />
Since you have said that online and offline spaces are different,we have to accept the fact that like any online offering, TH&#8217;s new version also goes through a beta (testing) stage.<br />
-Nikhil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
