Online Advertising

Measuring of ad campaign success is more stringent for portals

Banks, consumable brands etc spend big monies on print medium but never put any conditions on them – such and such percentage of your readers “have” to buy our product in response to our ad and only then we (advertiser) will pay you (print).

The advertiser cannot put such a condition as they cannot track the response of the reader. But there is one way to track – introduce discount coupons in the print ad and the advertiser will know how well the ad performed based on the number of coupons encashed. Anyways, I don’t think it will work in India.

But when it comes to advertising online, boy! there are tons of parameters – number of surfers who have seen the ad, number of clicks, number of conversions etc etc. I personally believe in India people do see the advertisement banners, they get an impression of the brand but they go and purchase that item “offline”. So the portals never get the credit of initiating the sale.

I came across an interesting article about Engagement 2.0:

Today, a true measure of engagement must include behaviours besides opens and clicks. Even purchases, while an important number, do not tell the whole story.

For example, what about forwards? If a customer gets an email that they like so much, that they feel so strongly about that they forward it to their entire email list, isn’t that worth something? Doesn’t that represent a truly engaged customer?

Or take a customer who opens all your email but never makes a single purchase: he or she is not necessarily more engaged—or more valuable—than a customer who opens one-tenth of your email, but spends loads when they do.

Conversely, if a customer opens your email and then unsubscribes from your list, well that’s a customer who you failed to engage. In the old scheme, the fact that they opened it generates a positive engagement score; the fact that they then unsubscribed is never captured….

BG Mahesh

Internet application ideator and implementor. Been there and done that since early 1990s. I like to present data to the common man in the simplest manner on the internet.

View Comments

  • "2.0" is so cliched`that almost anything has a 2.0 suffix. Like I just bumped across a matrimonial website which specilizes in widow/divorcee remarriages calling themselves "Matrimonial 2.0" !! Hope the baby boomers don't catch up on the idea.

Recent Posts

From Entropy to Negentropy: The Transformative Power of Open Finance- Part I

We live in a world awash with digital transformation, and yet filled with painful and…

1 year ago

Brand recall of the WiFi logo in India is very strong

It is a well-known fact that branding plays a significant role in the success of…

2 years ago

Fixing the Visa application process with Consent Managers

Lately I have been coming across the frustrations faced in the visa application process. Earlier,…

2 years ago

<strong>How India can solve the Challenges in Digital Advertising starting in 2023</strong>

India has the second-largest online population. The rapid Internet access and mobile proliferation is the…

3 years ago

Digital Media needs an Online Dispute Resolution system

The digital media landscape has changed tremendously over the last decade. Social media has amplified…

4 years ago

Digital Ad spend in India to grow 28% in 2021

It is not surprising to see advertising will grow in the year 2021. It does…

4 years ago