• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

BG Mahesh | mahesh.com

Internet in India

  • Home
  • Indian-Languages
  • Karnataka.com
  • Links
  • Gallery
  • About Mahesh
  • Contact Me
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Digital Media needs an Online Dispute Resolution system

BG Mahesh · October 10, 2021 · Leave a Comment

The digital media landscape has changed tremendously over the last decade. Social media has amplified false narratives to alarming levels. Let us set aside Left-Right-Center narratives for a moment. Those indulging in extreme views are not realizing the country’s image is taking a beating because of the narratives they are amplifying. The Honorable Supreme Court too had to take notice of the damage being caused,

  • Social media platforms must be accountable: Supreme Court
  • Election & Voting Processes Stand Threatened By Social Media Manipulation, Says Supreme Court
  • CJI flags ‘communal content’ in media

The court, rightfully, has supported citizens’ usage of social media to communicate their grievances.

A few social media giants were not happy with India’s new Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code Rules, 2021 – the sticky point – mandatorily appoint a Chief Compliance Officer, nodal officer and a resident grievance officer!

Govt had to issue ‘several last warnings‘ before Twitter complied by appointing a compliance officer. It is comforting to see the law requires social media platforms need to appoint a resident grievance officer. There was hesitation from social media platforms to appoint one.

Print and TV media have mechanisms to lodge your complaint but there is too much friction in lodging a complaint. The new IT Rules require media houses, including digital media, to appoint a grievance officer. However, the media is unhappy because the definition of grievance is not clear. If digital media had pro-actively appointed a mechanism to resolve grievances and disputes there wasn’t a need to introduce the new IT Rules. Media associations failed their members, they failed their readers.

To give an example a few media houses publish articles that target Prasar Bharti (AIR, DD).

Media should conduct itself in a responsible manner verifying all facts. Theres no change in content creation by Doordarshan Kalaburagi. Content from DD Kalaburagi will continue to be aired on @ddchandanabng in it its designated slot apart from digital platforms and social media. https://t.co/BKB07tk6pu

— Shashi Shekhar Vempati शशि शेखर (@shashidigital) October 9, 2021

The media publishes articles based on leads, nothing wrong with it. But are the authors always confirming from the authorized personnel of the entity in question about the veracity of the news? Let us assume they do speak to some officials who don’t want to be named, that’s fine. But when an official clarification is given why can’t the journalist publish the rebuttal too? I say it is mandatory to publish the rebuttal. And when it comes to digital, the editor has a duty to have a prominent link to the rebuttal from the original article.

What does the media house lose by publishing the rebuttal? Nothing. They only gain respect.

If senior officials are not able to get their voices heard what about individuals and smaller companies? How do they get their grievances heard?

Goats fighting. Dispute resolution. Unsplash by hbieser

Applying ODR to Media Disputes

Most grievances and disputes should not take up the bandwidth of our courts. The mechanism of online dispute resolution can absorb the bulk of such grievances/disputes. ODR uses the online application of tools such as negotiation, mediation and conciliation to amicably resolve disputes without them taking an adversarial, and often ugly, turn.

Online Dispute Resolution [ODR] can absorb the bulk of such cases. The ODR handbook from Agami has very useful info about this subject.

ODR is built on the vision that disputes can be resolved in a seamless manner, from anywhere, by anybody, at a fraction of cost and time.

Digital Media Look Other Grievance and Dispute Resolution Frameworks

The financial sector has mechanisms to deal with grievances and disputes. To quote from RBI’s notification,

..a proper analysis and disclosure of complaints would be possible only if there is an effective machinery for redressal of grievances in banks

RBI/2007-08/309 DBOD.No.Leg BC.81/09.07.005/2007-08

The Banking Ombudsman Scheme is an expeditious and inexpensive forum for bank customers for resolution of complaints relating to certain services rendered by banks. The Banking Ombudsman Scheme is introduced under Section 35 A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 by RBI with effect from 1995.

Banking Ombudsman FAQ

The Reserve Bank of India’s directive on online dispute resolution for digital payments says,

The ODR system should be a transparent, rule-based, system-driven, user-friendly and unbiased mechanism for resolving customer disputes and grievances, with zero or minimal manual intervention.

The media should start with a basic mechanism of recording disputes and evolve it over time. After all, RBI does that too – RBI redefines the Grievance Redress Mechanism in Banks.

India has a few digital media associations. It is very important for them to work with each other and agree upon a dispute resolution mechanism. If they don’t it will only harm their ecosystem. Designing an ODR framework for media will not be easy – you will have plenty of politically aligned readers who will flood the ODR platform. The media needs to work with ODR experts, ODR volunteers and ODR platforms to design an effective dispute resolution for media.  It can be done as we are seeing in the account aggregator ecosystem where many ODR innovators, thinkers and champions are collectively designing the ODR framework that is needed.

Next Steps

The various media associations should come up with an ODR framework. There are networks such as Agami where ODR innovators and leaders can support ecosystems/sectors to apply ODR to their unique dispute needs. This should not be seen as media not having freedom of speech.

We, readers, want news reporting to be accurate, opinions should be published under the heading Opinion and not News. It takes a lot of effort and time to design an ODR framework but this is a good opportunity for the media to be a changemaker.

The emergence of ODR solutions for media driven by the media players themselves will demonstrate to institutions such as the Ministry of information and broadcasting that there is a commitment on behalf of the players to manage their own conflicts and they do not need to be extensively regulated in a way that stifles innovation and creativity.

As much as there is a need to avoid acrimony and polarising behaviour in mass communications systems there is a greater need to do things that engender TRUST such as negotiate and mediate our grievances and disputes. Our society would be stronger for it.

Related Readings

  • ODR Handbook by Agami
  • False Narrative is more dangerous than Fake News
  • Self Regulatory Organization For Digital News in India

Related

Filed Under: Media Tagged With: online dispute resolution

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Connect

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Top Posts

  • Digital India: A list of popular government websites in India
    Digital India: A list of popular government websites in India
  • False Narrative is more dangerous than Fake News
    False Narrative is more dangerous than Fake News
  • A simple definition of Consumer 2.0..
    A simple definition of Consumer 2.0..
  • Real and Funny Addresses from college days
    Real and Funny Addresses from college days
  • About BG Mahesh
    About BG Mahesh

Recent Posts

  • Digital Media needs an Online Dispute Resolution system
  • Digital Ad spend in India to grow 28% in 2021
  • A Self Regulatory Organization Needed For Digital Media in India
  • 1995-2020: 25 years of internet in India
  • Sahamati turns one!

Categories

  • Government
  • Internet Portals
  • Mobile
  • Online Advertising
  • Internet
  • Media
  • Social Media
  • Broadband
  • Indian Languages
  • etc

Tags

3g acquisition bangalore Broadband broadband penetration browsers comscore dailyhunt digital india domain name Ecommerce election campaign election digital campaign elections facebook google hindi iamai imrb india online advertising indic fonts internet penetration iphone kannada market size mobile advertising mobile apps mobile internet mobile marketing mobile penetration my column mysore nielsen oneindia orkut Print Media sjce smartphones tier-2 tv advertising twitter ugc vijay next whatsapp yahoo

Copyright © 2022 · Mahesh.com

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.Accept Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT